User avatar
oilerlord
Posts: 1048
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2016 6:21 pm
Location: Siberia, AB
Contact: Website

Re: Global warming ...

Wed Jul 26, 2017 6:26 pm

IMAdolt wrote:It's always more beneficial to re-use rather than replace.



It is. We get so hypnotized by shiny things we tend to forget our three R's.
2014 Mercedes B-Class Electric Drive
2012 VW Jetta Sportwagen (not-so-clean-diesel) TDI
2008 BMW X3 3.0 "Beatrice"
2004 BMW 330Xi Sedan
My 9.2kW DC Solar: https://easyview.auroravision.net/easyview/index.html?entityId=7466210

Hank
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2018 10:25 am

Re: Global warming ...

Wed Nov 07, 2018 1:53 pm

No flaw--when it comes to individual choices, that's all one person can do. The value of my not littering is not diminished just because other people litter.

Now, when it comes to what we should do collectively, through our governments, that's much trickier.

Cheers, Wayne

summit
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 11:13 pm

Re: Global warming ...

Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:40 pm

on the topic of personal CO2 footprint accounting, it is surprising how much of an impact one can do, similar to Oilerlord's situation. I use a rough percentage for a typical US American, our footprint is roughly 34% vehicles, 33% residence and 33% the remainder (air travel, food, work offices ....). Obviously the fraction is different for location as well as personal situation. I believe it's 40% for vehicle in California.

In theory, one can generate sufficient roof-top power to cover the first 2 categories: EVs, residence heatpump for heating & hot water, insulation etc... The remaining third can roughly be addressed with food choices, less consumption, recycling, turn office lights off etc.... The idea is not to reduce the footprint to zero, but to minimize it.

The low hanging fruit is obviously EV, then residential.

plj
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 9:52 pm
Location: Davis, California

Re: Global warming ...

Tue Dec 18, 2018 10:29 pm

Here's a nice discussion of what we can do, giving the relative magnitude of the benefit of the changes we make.

The key takeaway thought: "The four actions that most substantially decrease an individual's carbon footprint are: eating a plant-based diet, avoiding air travel, living car-free, and having smaller families."

https://phys.org/news/2017-07-effective ... ussed.html

Governments and schools are not communicating the most effective ways for individuals to reduce their carbon footprints, according to new research.

Published today in the journal Environmental Research Letters, the study from Lund University, found that the incremental changes advocated by governments may represent a missed opportunity to reduce greenhouse gas emissions beneath the levels needed to prevent 2°C of climate warming.

The four actions that most substantially decrease an individual's carbon footprint are: eating a plant-based diet, avoiding air travel, living car-free, and having smaller families.

The research analysed 39 peer reviewed papers, carbon calculators, and government reports to calculate the potential of a range of individual lifestyle choices to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This comprehensive analysis identifies the actions individuals could take that will have the greatest impact on reducing their greenhouse gas emissions.

Lead author Seth Wynes said: "There are so many factors that affect the climate impact of personal choices, but bringing all these studies side-by-side gives us confidence we've identified actions that make a big difference. Those of us who want to step forward on climate need to know how our actions can have the greatest possible impact. This research is about helping people make more informed choices.

"We found there are four actions that could result in substantial decreases in an individual's carbon footprint: eating a plant-based diet, avoiding air travel, living car free, and having smaller families. For example, living car-free saves about 2.4 tonnes of CO2 equivalent per year, while eating a plant-based diet saves 0.8 tonnes of CO2 equivalent a year.

"These actions, therefore, have much greater potential to reduce emissions than commonly promoted strategies like comprehensive recycling (which is 4 times less effective than a plant-based diet) or changing household lightbulbs (8 times less effective)."

The researchers also found that neither Canadian school textbooks nor government resources from the EU, USA, Canada and Australia highlight these actions, instead focussing on incremental changes with much smaller potential to reduce emissions.

Study co-author Kimberly Nicholas said: "We recognize these are deeply personal choices. But we can't ignore the climate effect our lifestyle actually has. Personally, I've found it really positive to make many of these changes. It's especially important for young people establishing lifelong patterns to be aware which choices have the biggest impact. We hope this information sparks discussion and empowers individuals," she concluded.

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2017-07-effective ... d.html#jCp

Return to “Off-Topic”