I regret not having the patience to wait for delivery of the Tesla 3 and asking for my deposit to be returned.

Frankly, I do not understand Ioniq's purpose on the US market. Even as other manufacturers (who want a slice of action in the upcoming EV party) are sweating blood to come up with a 200-250 mile, highly distinct car, Hyundai surprises us with a 120-mile Ioniq EV that looks like a facelifted 2009 Insight. I am sure Ioniq offers great value for money and long warranty, but it can be a primary everyday car for maybe 1% of the US drivers.Diggle wrote:Do you guys think Chevy Bolt is better than Hyundai IONIQ?
Just because the Ioniq doesn't meet YOUR needs, doesn't mean that it won't be attractive to other buyers. 125 mile range would suit me fine (for almost $10K less), and Hyundai is working on offering a larger battery for 2018. As a data point, about 17.5 million cars were sold in the US last year. You mentioned 1%. 1% of 17.5 million is 175,000. I think that Hyundai would be ecstatic if they could sell 175,000 Ioniqs. Or 17,500 (10% of 1%).dDF wrote:Frankly, I do not understand Ioniq's purpose on the US market. Even as other manufacturers (who want a slice of action in the upcoming EV party) are sweating blood to come up with a 200-250 mile, highly distinct car, Hyundai surprises us with a 120-mile Ioniq EV that looks like a facelifted 2009 Insight. I am sure Ioniq offers great value for money and long warranty, but it can be a primary everyday car for maybe 1% of the US drivers.Diggle wrote:Do you guys think Chevy Bolt is better than Hyundai IONIQ?
The Bolt, as of May 2017, is the only available utilitarian EV, that's why it has to be better than Ioniq
CARB credits are probably as valuable to Hyundai as they are to Chevy.dDF wrote:
Frankly, I do not understand Ioniq's purpose on the US market.
oilerlord wrote:CARB credits are probably as valuable to Hyundai as they are to Chevy.dDF wrote:
Frankly, I do not understand Ioniq's purpose on the US market.